LA1030
Structured notes, exam attack plans, AI essay marking, and past papers built specifically for UOL External LLB students. Not a generic law site — every word is written for your marking scheme.
Built for External LLB students worldwide
Study from Pakistan, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, the UK — or anywhere
Good morning, Sarah 👋
116 days until October. Keep going.
116
days
34%
Overall
3
In progress
8
Not started
Continue studying
Contract Law
8/13 topics
Equity & Trusts
5/13 topics
AI Tutor
Past Papers
Exam Prep
Flashcards
64 / 100
Merit · 2:120+
LLB Modules
1,200
Flashcards
~30s
AI Essay Feedback
220+
Practice Questions
Sound familiar?
You've covered every chapter. But in the exam you freeze — because textbooks don't tell you how the UOL examiner wants you to structure an answer.
You spend hours on cases your lecturer mentioned. The UOL marker wants specific cases, cited in a specific way. Without an attack plan, you're guessing.
UOL gives zero essay feedback. You practice on past papers, guess whether your structure is right, and the first person to properly mark your work is the examiner — in the actual exam.
The fix
Attack plans, AI essay marking, past papers, module notes, flashcards, an AI tutor — everything written and calibrated specifically for the UOL External mark scheme. Not a generic law platform. Yours.
See it for yourself — it's freeThe three certainties must be satisfied for a valid express trust.
Certainty of objects is the contested limb on these facts.
For a discretionary trust the governing test is that laid down in McPhail v Doulton.
The question is whether it can be said with certainty that any given
individual is or is not a member of the class.
The complete list test in IRC v Broadway Cottages therefore no
longer applies to trusts of this kind.
Accordingly the trust is valid and the trustees may distribute.
Upper Second
Merit · 2:1Marked against the University of London grade descriptors — the same bands your examiner uses.
Not a generic summary. Real UOL Equity & Trusts content — the exact frameworks, feedback, and answers that help students jump from Pass to Merit to Distinction.
Exam question — Equity & Trusts
"Critically analyse the requirements for certainty of objects in discretionary trusts, with reference to the development of the case law."
Identify the issue
A trust for objects that cannot be identified with certainty is void. For discretionary trusts, the question is not just whether a list can be drawn up — it is whether any given person can be said to be or not be a beneficiary. Begin by classifying the trust type: fixed or discretionary.
State the rule — and its development
Old rule (fixed trusts)
Complete list test — all beneficiaries must be identifiable. IRC v Broadway Cottages Trust [1955]
Revolution — House of Lords
"Is or is not" test — can it be said of any given person whether they are or are not a member of the class? McPhail v Doulton [1971] — Lord Wilberforce rejected the complete list test for discretionary trusts as too restrictive.
Analyse the three judicial approaches (Re Baden No 2)
Critical evaluation — is the test workable?
Conclusion
Want the full attack plans, AI marking, and tutor access?
Sign up free — no credit card needed. Upgrade only when you're ready.
Sign up and get 5 days of full Premium access — free, no card needed.
Structured PDF Notes
Concise, exam-focused notes written for UOL External students. Every case, every principle — nothing irrelevant.
Exam Attack Plans
Step-by-step frameworks for answering any exam question. Know exactly what to write and in what order.
Teacher Video Recordings
Private video walkthroughs of complex topics and past paper questions — like having a personal tutor.
AI Essay Marking
Submit your essay and get detailed feedback in seconds — score, strengths, missing cases, and how to improve.
Past Paper Browser
Every UOL past paper question organised by module, year, and zone. With examiner marking guidance and AI marking.
Flashcard Revision
Case law and legal principles in an interactive flip-card format. Filter by module or topic for focused revision.
This is exactly what students see inside the platform. Not a generic summary — a structured attack plan written for the UOL examiner.
Amy advertises her car for sale at £8,000. Bob emails saying he will buy it for £7,500. Amy replies "I might accept £7,750." Bob then emails "I accept your offer of £7,750." Amy has already sold the car to Carl.
Advise Bob.
Issues to spot
Attack Plan
How to structure your answer — step by step
Is Amy's advertisement an offer or an invitation to treat?
Advertisements for the sale of goods are almost always an invitation to treat, not an offer. The advertiser is inviting the public to make offers — they cannot be forced into a contract with every person who responds.
Amy's £8,000 advert = invitation to treat. It creates no legal obligation.
Bob's email for £7,500 — counter-offer, not acceptance
Bob responds with a different price. This is a counter-offer — it proposes new terms and automatically destroys the original offer. There is no longer an offer for £8,000 on the table.
Counter-offer = rejection of original offer. Bob cannot later accept the £8,000 price.
Amy's reply — "I might accept £7,750" — is this a valid offer?
The word "might" is critical. A valid offer requires a definite promise to be bound. Tentative language like "I might" or "I would consider" does not constitute an offer — it is at most an invitation to negotiate.
Amy's reply is probably not an offer — it's an invitation to make a further offer.
Bob's purported acceptance — is there a valid offer to accept?
Conclusion + what Bob can argue + remedies
Distinction tip
Most students spot Hyde v Wrench but miss that Amy's "I might accept" is almost certainly not a valid offer either — making Bob's acceptance doubly ineffective. Raising both points and analysing Harvey v Facey is what separates Merit from Distinction answers.
Every module. Every topic. Every exam question type.
Attack plans for 20+ modules — problem questions, essays, and critical analysis.
Thousands of UOL External LLB students study without a campus, without a seminar leader, and without access to UK law tutors. This platform was built to solve that — specifically.
Generic law revision sites teach you the subject. This platform teaches you what examiners at the University of London actually reward. Every note, every attack plan, and every AI response is calibrated to the External LLB marking criteria — not a domestic university seminar.
UOL External students don't have seminar groups, walk-in office hours, or a classmate down the hall. This platform fills every gap — structured notes that replace lectures, an AI tutor available at 2am in any time zone, and teacher recordings on the way.
Knowing the law is not the same as passing the exam. This platform forces exam-mode thinking at every step: timed question formats, AI marking against the UOL grade scale, and feedback that tells you exactly which cases you missed and why you lost marks.
The difference
Less than a single textbook. Cancel anytime.
Start free — no card required
or PKR 50,000/year — 2 months free
or PKR 79,999/year — best value
All plans include a free account. Upgrade only when you're ready.
Not a generic law site — a revision system engineered around the External LLB exam.
Calibrated to the UOL mark scheme
Notes, attack plans and flashcards are written for the University of London External LLB exam specifically — not a generic law syllabus rehashed for everyone.
AI marking against the real grade descriptors
Submit a past-paper essay and get feedback scored against the same UOL grade bands your examiner uses — with the missing cases and structure fixes spelled out.
Attack plans built around the marks
Each plan is structured around how a question is marked, not how the topic is taught — so you write to score, not just to describe.
Built by a UOL External student
Made by someone sitting the same exam, who reverse-engineered the marking — not a textbook publisher writing at arm’s length.
Study from anywhere, any time zone
An AI tutor available 24/7 and a full library you can reach from any country — designed for independent students without a local UK tutor.
Real past papers (2022–2024) + AI practice questions
Practise on every real UOL past paper from 2022–2024 plus 130+ AI-generated questions in the exam's exact style — with worked answer breakdowns and examiner marking guidance, so nothing on exam day is a surprise.
Join students from Pakistan, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, and beyond who are using LawRevise to prepare properly.
Create your free accountNo credit card required. Cancel anytime.